|
Page
1/3 | Go To Page 2 | Go
To Page 3
SAN
DIEGO COUNTY
COMPREHENSIVE
STRATEGY
FOR
YOUTH,
FAMILY, AND COMMUNITY
Submitted By
San Diego County Comprehensive Strategy Team
COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Executive Summary........................... i
Introduction
Key to Success......................... 1
Vision.............................. 1
Mission............................ 2
Guiding Principles......................... 2
Comprehensive Strategy Themes.................. 3
Risk Data and Definitions
Risk Data Profile........................ 4
Definitions of a Continuum of Prevention and Graduated Sanctions....
5
Assessment of Existing Resources in the Region
Identified Gaps in the Continuum................... 6
Addressing Juvenile Crime
San Diego's Plan for Addressing Juvenile Crime............ 10
Recommendations for an Effective Continuum of Services, From
Prevention Through Graduated Sanctions............... 19
Recommendations for Implementation, Management, and Evaluation
('Infrastructure')........................ 20
Accomplishments and Branching Impacts................ 21
Implementation
Implementing the Comprehensive Strategy............... 23
Benchmarks: How Will We Know When We Get There?......... 23
Forecasting the Future
Major Trends......................... 25
Projections.......................... 27
Summary.............................. 28
Appendix.............................. 29
TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED)
Attachment 1: Summary of Community Risk Profile Data...... 31
Attachment 2: Inventory of Existing Resources............ 33
Attachment 3: Gender Specific Programming, County and
State Arrest Rate Comparisons........... 47
Attachment 4: San Diego County Report Card........... 51
Attachment 5: San Diego Regional Risk & Resiliency
* Checkup.....................
53
Attachment 6: San Diego Region Comprehensive Strategy
Work Groups................... 57
INTRODUCTION_____________________________________________
During the last decade, San Diego County experienced an upswing in
juvenile crime and violence. Youth used and sold drugs. Youth armed
themselves with weapons. Juvenile homicide rates rose. Dire predictions
of a future filled with "super predators" frightened the public. Curfews
were reinstated. "Zero Tolerance" initiatives were enacted for drugs
and weapons on school campuses, and school police forces came into existence.
Legislative and political agendas within the state and county responded
to the community's cry for tighter controls on juveniles in the interest
of public safety. This was a shift from a child welfare focus to one
of juvenile accountability.
In early 1996, San Diego County Board of Supervisor Ron Roberts met
with Shay Bilchik, Administrator, United States Department of Justice,
Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP), to discuss
the strengths and weaknesses of San Diego County in dealing with juvenile
delinquency. San Diego County was looking for new approaches, cutting
edge strategies and guidance from experts across the country to continue
and expand our efforts in promoting positive development of youth and
preventing juvenile delinquency. San Diego County was ready and able
to implement OJJDP's new Comprehensive Strategy for Serious, Violent,
and Chronic Juvenile Offenders. As a result, San Diego became one of
the first three sites in the nation to be provided with technical assistance
from OJJDP for the implementation of this strategy.
In May 1996, consultants hired by OJJDP from the National Council on
Crime and Delinquency (NCCD) and Developmental Research and Programs
(DRP) conducted a site visit to San Diego to begin the planning and
training processes for the Comprehensive Strategy. During this visit,
NCCD and DRP provided training outlining the goals and objectives of
the Comprehensive Strategy for more than 50 county and community policy
makers and key leaders. Following key leader buy-in, in December 1996,
the consultants conducted a three-day training for more than 200 line
staff and community members. During this training, individuals, agencies
and organizations made a full commitment to join and participate in,
both as initial planners and long-term members with, the San Diego County
Comprehensive Strategy Team. Two task forces (Graduated Sanctions &
Prevention) were created to continue the planning process for the Comprehensive
Strategy Plan over the next year. In April 1997, the Comprehensive Strategy
Planners altered their original structure and combined the two task
forces into one. It was important to note that San Diego believed it
was essential to have a united team, working side by side, with clear
communication as the planning process was moving forward. San Diego's
Comprehensive Strategy Team (CST) formed six work groups to deal specifically
with issues of resource development, coordination, community engagement,
advocacy, key leader buy-in and information sharing. The technical assistance
from the NCCD and DRP culminated in a two-day workshop in October 1997,
with more than 150 participants developing six promising approaches
to fill the needs and gaps identified in the continuum of services,
from prevention through graduated
sanctions.
SHARED VISION____________________________________________
San Diego's Comprehensive Strategy Plan was developed with input from
diverse sources that contributed experience, professional expertise,
national, state and local data and statistics, and many creative ideas
and methodologies. Researchers, front-line staff, executives and community
representatives worked together to craft a course of action. Our strategic
plan proposes an integrated systems approach with an expectation of
sustained and measured results. This plan was based upon the shared
vision that all of San Diego's youth will develop into Caring, Literate,
Educated And Responsible (CLEAR) community members. In order to achieve
this vision, the Comprehensive Strategy Plan and Team must continue
to represent a regional, coordinated effort and stay focused as it continues
to work to strengthen communities and families to develop healthy, responsible
youth through prevention, intervention and appropriate graduated sanctions.
MISSION____________________________________________________
The mission of the Comprehensive Strategy Team is to:
- Strengthen families and communities by developing youth who are
Caring, Literate, Educated And Responsible (CLEAR);
- Support core institutions, such as schools, health care providers,
government agencies, faith communities and community-based organizations
in their role in developing youth;
- Emphasize prevention as the most cost-effective approach to the
reduction of delinquency;
- Provide immediate and effective intervention with youth at their
first sign of problems or inappropriate behavior;
- Institute a broad range of care and rehabilitative services;
- Reduce duplication of effort and fill service gaps; and
- Help communities to define and establish effective collaboration.
KEY TO SUCCESS___________________________________________
Policy makers, key leaders, youth and family-serving organizations
and community members worked together from the beginning as a strong
team in a coordinated fashion to create a vision, mission, strategies
and design for the San Diego County Comprehensive Strategy Plan. It
is vital to include, from the onset, community residents and youth,
in discussions and planning. Their input, buy in and support are crucial
to the implementation and sustainability of the Comprehensive Strategy
Plan. It was the first time a collaboration of this magnitude occurred
in the county specific to juvenile justice. Leadership and support from
San Diego's policy and decision makers for the vision, process of cross-system
teamwork, and support of community grass roots efforts are key to the
success of the Comprehensive Strategy in San Diego County.
GUIDING PRINCIPLES______________________________________
San Diego's Comprehensive Strategy Plan will serve as a blueprint for
community action and collaboration. It provides a broad spectrum of
recommendations that will help mobilize youth, adults, agencies and
organizations to strengthen youth, families and communities. The strategy
must make everyone aware of our shared vision. No single individual,
organization or agency can address all of the factors contributing to
juvenile delinquency and violence. Working together, however, local
leaders, representatives of public and private groups, schools and individual
community members, including youth, can bring about systems change and
strategies that work. Borrowing from OJJDP, the San Diego County Comprehensive
Strategy Plan begins with the same five general principles:
Guiding Principle # 1 - We must strengthen families. We
must recognize that the family has primary responsibility to instill
values and provide guidance and support to children. When necessary,
we must strengthen the family in support of these responsibilities.
Where there is no functional family unit, we must establish a family
surrogate and assist that entity to guide and nurture the child.
Guiding Principle # 2 - We must support core social institutions
schools, faith community and community organizations in their
roles of developing capable, mature and responsible youth.
Guiding Principle # 3 - We must promote prevention as the
most cost-effective and humane approach to reducing juvenile delinquency.
Communities must take the lead in designing and building cohesive
prevention approaches that address known risk factors and target
other youth at risk of delinquency.
Guiding Principle # 4 - We must intervene immediately and effectively
when delinquent behavior occurs to successfully prevent offenders
from committing progressively more serious and violent crimes and
becoming chronic offenders.
Guiding Principle # 5 - We must identify and sanction the small
group of serious, violent and chronic juvenile offenders.
SAN DIEGO
JUVENILE CRIME
AT A GLANCE:______________
Comprehensive Strategy planners thoroughly reviewed risk data for the
County of San Diego. (Attachment 1-Summary of Community Risk Profile
Data.) It is critical during the planning process to identify trends,
shifts and significant increases and decreases in data related not just
to at-risk behavior, but also to specific juvenile crime and conviction
information. Specific statistics for the juvenile criminal justice system
follow:
Population Growth: From 1994 to 2003, the number of San
Diego youth between the ages of 10 and 19 is projected to increase
26%.
Juvenile Arrest Rates: The juvenile arrest rate was noticeably
higher in 1995 (74 per 1,000 juveniles) than the adult rate (54
per 1,000 adults).
Homicides for Youth: Comparing all age categories, homicide
rates countywide for each year between 1991 and 1993 were the highest
for youth ages 15-19 years.
Substance Abuse: From 1991 to 1995, juvenile arrests for
drug and alcohol violations increased 52%. Of particular interest
is a 95% increase in arrests in the dangerous drug category, which
includes methamphetamine. Also, violations of marijuana laws increased
over 200%. The Drug Use Forecasting (DUF) program conducts quarterly,
confidential interviews with juveniles taken into Juvenile Hall
after arrest. Based on urinalysis tests, 65% of the juveniles
contacted in December 1996, showed recent drug use. This contrasts
with 34% testing drug-positive in 1992; 44% positive in 1993; and
54% positive in 1995.
Weapons Use: A San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG)
study interviewed youth taken to Juvenile Hall. Of the 202 male
juveniles interviewed, 44% reported having owned a gun at some time,
and the majority stated that it was easy to get a gun illegally.
More than a quarter of youth said they had used a gun to commit
a crime. Exposure to violence is related to gun possession. More
than half of the youth interviewed in the DUF program reported having
been shot at. More than one-third agreed that it is 'OK' to shoot
someone who hurts you.
Gang Membership: A survey in October 1996, by the Jurisdictions
Unified for Drug Gang Enforcement (J.U.D.G.E.) showed that in eight
of the ten law enforcement jurisdictions covering the region, there
are an estimated 126 gangs and 9,630 documented gang members.
Juvenile Hall Admissions: From 1992 to 1996, there was a
43% increase in admissions to Juvenile Hall (4278 versus 6,121).
In 1996, 1,200 juveniles were admitted to Juvenile Hall for violent
offenses, a 35% increase from 1992.
Remands to Adult Criminal Court: Remands to adult criminal
court (707s) increased from 39 in 1992 to 322 in 1996.
DEFINITIONS OF A CONTINUUM
OF PREVENTION AND GRADUATED
SANCTIONS___________________________________
San Diego County Comprehensive Strategy Team recognized that having
common language, terminology and definitions was crucial for organizations,
agencies, community members and youth to effectively work as a cohesive
team in all aspects of the planning process. In order to ensure the
continuing participation of all team members, a commitment must be made
to clearly define a shared language and frequently used terms that can
be understood by those outside of the juvenile justice field. San Diego
County Comprehensive Strategy Team defined the following key terms:
Continuum: A continuous spectrum of services and programs
that can include prevention, intervention, supervision, incarceration
and treatment.
Prevention: Programs and resources that address community,
family and individual risk factors and enhance protective factors
that will minimize the risk of delinquent behavior.
Intervention: Resources that provide immediate, swift responses
within the community; often used for first-time, nonviolent offenders
programs. Includes juvenile diversion and community intervention
resources, Counsel-and-Close
programs, community restitution and community service, etc. May
be nonresidential or residential.
Supervision: A spectrum of resources that are provided primarily
by Probation (but not exclusively) ranging from informal supervision
to intensive supervision.
Incarceration: Resources that are considered secure care,
generally reserved for the most serious and violent offenders. These
may include local resources such as Juvenile Hall and the Ranch
Facilities, California Youth Authority (CYA) or jail. Incarceration
may also be used as a means of providing swift and certain consequences
for wards of the court that violate terms of their probation, such
as Probation's Short Term Offender Program (STOP) combined with
supervision following incarceration.
Treatment: Resources that address the specific needs and
problems of both at-risk and delinquent youth and their families.
Treatment includes substance abuse counseling and rehabilitation,
mental health, vocational training, education, parent training and
support and mentoring. Treatment can be appropriate at all stages
of the continuum.
ASSESSMENT OF EXISTING
RESOURCES IN THE
REGION____________________________________________________
During the planning of the San Diego County Local Action Plan (SB1760),
a Juvenile Justice Coordinating Council was convened. This council was
appointed by the San Diego County Board of Supervisors and is required
by law. It is chaired by the Chief Probation Officer and appointees
include representatives of the Board of Supervisors, Chief Administrative
Officer, District Attorney, Public Defender, Sheriff, San Diego Police
Department, Education, Chair of the Juvenile Justice Commission, Executive
Directors of Community Agencies, Alcohol and other Drug Service Providers,
Mental Health, Social Service, Juvenile Court and community-at-large
members. This Council is the support and implementation body of the
San Diego County Comprehensive Plan. The Council and the Comprehensive
Strategy Team began with the premise that delinquency and violence have
multiple causes, with many occurring simultaneously. Effective resolution
and treatment requires that a broad spectrum of locally based resources
be available to meet multiple needs. They also recognized that San Diego
County has gained national recognition as a leader in developing collaborative,
integrated service delivery models for addressing the multiple needs
of at-risk children and their families. The Council extensively inventoried
existing resources throughout San Diego County for the research and
development of the San Diego Local Action Plan (SB1760). The Comprehensive
Strategy Team, holding true to ending duplication and redundancy, used
this detailed information when addressing needs and gaps in the County.
(Attachment 2-Inventory of Existing Resources.)
IDENTIFIED NEEDS
AND GAPS IN THE CONTINUUM_________
The Comprehensive Strategy planners used a structured decision-making
approach to develop consensus on those service needs and gaps deemed
most critical to the Comprehensive Strategy implementation. These critical
needs and gaps were categorized into one of the following areas:
Program Needs and gaps identified in this category
represent either specific program services such as afterschool programs
for middle school age youth for prevention, as well as services
that might be considered necessary components of a multi-systemic
or comprehensive approach (such as providing substance abuse or
vocational programming at a day treatment program);
Geographic - Certain areas of the County lack specific
resources that are available to serve residents in other communities.
Comprehensive Strategy planners were asked to identify program
and service needs and gaps unique to various geographic areas
of the County;
Concrete Support Services - In addition to primary program
and service needs and gaps, there is recognition that additional
support services must be available for primary treatment to be
effective (such as childcare, transportation and housing). Comprehensive
Strategy planners were asked to identify concrete support services
that they believe are critical in supporting a comprehensive continuum
of service; and
Infrastructure - In order for a systemwide, continuum-based
approach to be effective, there are policy, process and procedural
elements that must be in place, such as accountability/evaluation
tools and communication mechanisms. Comprehensive Strategy Planners
were asked to identify infrastructure needs critical to successful
implementation of the Comprehensive Strategy Plan.
Using several comprehensive assessments of existing resources, from prevention
through graduated sanctions and aftercare, the Comprehensive Strategy
planners identified needs and gaps in the continuum, which are listed
in the following tables:
TABLE 1 - Results of Survey To Identify Critical Program Needs
and Gaps in the San Diego Region
Top Five Need and Gap Areas: (prioritized by number of
times appearing in top 5):
- Substance abuse treatment for youth and families at all steps of
the continuum (in- and outpatient);
- Afterschool programs for middle school age youth and latency age
programs, both on and off school campuses;
- Parent education, training, support and home visitation;
- Vocational/technical training, especially in skilled trades; and
- Specific programs for girls.
Additional High Priority Program Needs and Gaps:
- Services for abused adolescents, runaway and homeless youth;
- Aftercare reintegration and step-down programs with intensive family
work, for all youth, including those from CYA;
- Community policing;
- Halfway houses for clean and sober youth targeted to specific ethnic
groups;
- Community recreation;
- Day treatment programs;
- Emancipation/independent living skills;
- Early gang prevention and intervention;
- Graduation incentives;
- Specific juvenile sex offender programs;
- Literacy programs for all ages of youth;
- Mental health services for all family members;
- Mentoring programs;
- Recruiting program linkages;
- Residential programs;
- Residential and day treatment for offenders who are pregnant and
parenting teens;
- Early screening and intervention for high risk factors/behaviors
across community systems;
- Teen birth control clinics accessible regionally and institutionally;
and
- Services and programs for victims of gang violence.
Table 2 - Results of Survey to Identify Critical Geographical Programming
Needs and Gaps in the San Diego Region
|
Geographic needs and gaps identified as critical, in addition
to a common consensus that gaps and needs across the entire continuum
of services exist in the North, East and South County areas:
- Day treatment and supervision programs to serve youth and
families located within each region;
- Drug and alcohol services for adolescents available for youth
and families within each region; and
- Correctional facilities and treatment programs in North County
specifically.
|
Table 3 - Results of Survey to Identify Critical Concrete, Support
Services needs and GAPS in the San Diego Region
|
Concrete support services necessary for primary treatment
programming to be effective include:
- Basic housing necessities, including utilities;
- Quality child care that is affordable and accessible;
- Clothing;
- Family preservation services and home support (including
parenting classes);
- Graduation incentives;
- Quality health services that are affordable and accessible;
- Income maintenance;
- Independent living skills;
- Job training and placement;
- Mentoring support; and
- Transportation.
|
Table 4 - Results of Survey to Identify Critical Infrastructure
Needs and GAPS in the San Diego Region
Infrastructure needs and gaps
(policy, process and procedural elements) that must be in place
to 'hold' the system together and to work effectively:
- Accountability tools, such as ongoing quality assurance and
system outcome measures, sanctions for not being a team player
and holding participants in every subsystem accountable to the
whole;
- Adoption of a systemwide approach to funding new and expanding
programs, based upon risk and resource assessments;
- Common definitions of geographic boundaries and service delivery
areas among all public agency systems to be used for planning
and needs assessments. Allocation of resources, services, management
of indicator data, etc. to facilitate integrated planning, service
delivery, data sharing and outcome evaluation;
- Community development approaches that involve the community
(including business) and youth in program planning, development
and implementation, and support their involvement and commitment
in developing safer community environments;
- Community education on service delivery systems and the role
of the juvenile justice system throughout the county;
- Consistency among law enforcement agencies on policy and
partnering strategies in developing and implementing the Comprehensive
Strategy;
- Cross-systems training;
- Local control of state and federal funding;
- Management information and communication systems that allow
accurate and efficient data collection, data compilation and
data sharing to occur across multiple agencies (where allowed
by law);
- Memorandums of agreement/understanding between programs and
collaborating agencies that define responsibilities and roles
for implementing a coordinated approach to working with at-risk
youth and families;
- More participants in the Comprehensive Strategy effort (e.g.,
more school districts, youth and community members);
- Reintegration of students who have been expelled (reexamine
zero tolerance policy);
- Risk and needs assessments for communities;
- Risk and needs assessments for at-risk youth at all stages
of the continuum and across program boundaries; and
- Strategies to integrate approaches for abused as well as
delinquent youth and their families, including coordination
with the system planning efforts and delivery functions of the
Heartbeat project.
|
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR AN EFFECTIVE
CONTINUUM OF SERVICES,
FROM PREVENTION THROUGH
GRADUATED SANCTIONS_________________________________________________
Historically, government has responded to youth problems by providing
services to address symptoms. This often results in an inefficient use
of scarce resources. Children labeled as delinquent traditionally enter
the correctional system, which has been unable to address underlying
family issues and other problems. Youth intervention agencies identify
some children as abused or neglected, remove them from their homes,
and place them in foster care, but agencies fail or are unable to provide
family support or preventive mental health services. Children with acute
mental health needs are placed in secure psychiatric settings with little
opportunity for treatment in community-based, family-oriented mental
health programs.
Fragmentation does not serve anyone effectively youth, families,
communities or systems. The system is expensive and often fails to solve
youths' problems. Comprehensive, integrated and targeted collaborative
efforts can more effectively assess the needs of at-risk youth, implement
promising strategies and maximize community resources.
Communities and families must have the primary role in preventing juvenile
delinquency. All community members business leaders, media representatives,
teachers, parents and grandparents, youth, policy makers, faith leaders,
elected officials and law enforcement are responsible for ensuring
the health and well-being of children. When all members of the community
work together to achieve common goals, everyone benefits from the strength
of the working partnership.
The following recommendations are presented to fill identified needs
and gaps in the continuum of services. These recommendations are also
intended to help San Diego communities and neighborhoods with community
development and mobilization that will support them in identifying and
prioritizing problems, creating opportunities and implementing solutions,
as well as strengthen and enhance existing efforts focused on prevention.
Recommendation #1 - Community Mobilization: Increase
the number of community members (individuals and families, schools,
businesses, organizations and service providers) engaged to mobilize
and promote crime-free, healthy communities that are safe places for
children to learn and grow.
Recommendation #2 - Community Risk and Resource Assessments:
Adopt instruments to assess and identify local community needs,
resources and priorities for development of community-based prevention
programs that target at-risk youth and juvenile offenders.
Recommendation # 3 - Substance Abuse Efforts: Support
the recommendations of San Diego's 1996 Substance Abuse Summit, 1996
Methamphetamine Strike Force and the San Diego County Juvenile Forensics
Services on integrated approaches for the prevention of youth alcohol
and substance abuse.
Recommendation #4 - Community Norms: Support development
and adoption of community laws and norms that guard against substance
abuse, weapon possession and all aspects of juvenile delinquency, and
encourage positive alternatives.
Recommendation #5 - Risk and Treatment Needs Instruments:
Adopt shared, structured decision-making instruments for assessing individual
at risk youth and their families. Promote and secure consensus on use
of these instruments from all involved public and private agencies.
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR IMPLEMENTATION,
MANAGEMENT AND EVALUATION
('INFRASTRUCTURE')________________________________________
San Diego is fortunate to have broad support for our comprehensive
planning efforts from many elected officials and other juvenile justice
policymakers, community leaders, public and private program administrators,
schools, law enforcement and community programs and groups. However,
given the large size of our region, both geographic and population (4,200
square miles, 18 incorporated cities and more communities within these
cities and unincorporated areas) and the ethnic and cultural diversity
of our communities, we must continue to garner regional community support
and broad involvement - especially from youth and families.
Based upon on the OJJDP Guide description of key activities necessary
for successful implementation of a comprehensive plan to reduce juvenile
crime and delinquency, San Diego's Comprehensive Strategy planners developed
the following recommendations to address critical infrastructure needs.
Recommendation #6 - Systemwide, Balanced Approach to Funding:
Promote a balanced approach to funding prevention, early intervention
and graduated sanctions programs that consider both safety needs of
the community and treatment needs of at-risk and juvenile offenders,
and their families.
Recommendation #7 - Public Outreach Strategy: Develop
a comprehensive, countywide public outreach strategy that continuously
engages the public and policy makers in the prevention and the reduction
of juvenile crime and in the promotion of healthy and crime-free lifestyles.
Recommendation #8 - Cross-Systems Training: Provide cross-systems
training between public and private agency providers to acquire common
language and methodologies and promote collaborative efforts.
Recommendation #9 - Interagency Agreements: Develop formal
interagency agreements (e.g. Memorandums of Understanding or Agreement)
that explicitly state the relationships, roles, responsibilities and
expected outcomes for all parties in collaborative efforts to reduce
juvenile crime and delinquency, and promote positive development of
youth.
Recommendation #10 - Case Management and Process Control:
Develop a case management system that follows each youth through
the various stages of the continuum of care. Designate the Chief Probation
Officer with responsibility and resources needed to coordinate an interagency,
centralized intake process, case management and program control (including
assessment, monitoring and feedback) for identified at-risk and juvenile
offenders.
Recommendation #11 - Management Information System: Build
on existing management information system (MIS) efforts to facilitate
relevant communication and data sharing by all criminal justice agencies
and collaborating entities (public and private) consistent with appropriate
protection of privacy rights.
Recommendation #12 - Evaluation: Provide for locally
relevant ongoing evaluation of programs, agencies and strategies to
ensure effectiveness and to allocate resources based upon need and documented
effectiveness.
BENCHMARKS______________________________________________
The Comprehensive Strategy Team designated specific benchmarks to identify
successful completion of the recommendations. Each recommendation is
accompanied by concrete outcomes that will demonstrate to the community
an effective collaboration with sustainable and measurable results.
| Benchmarks:
How Will We Know When We Get There? |
|
1. Community Mobilization
|
The percentage of community members (individuals
and families, schools, business, organizations and service providers)
engaged in efforts to mobilize and promote crime-free, healthy communities
will increase from 35% to 75%. |
|
2. Community Risk and Resource Assessments
|
Instruments to assess and identify local
needs, resources and priorities for development of community-based
prevention programs that target at-risk youth and juvenile offenders
are developed, adopted and implemented across agencies and organizations.
The San Diego County Board of Supervisors and local municipalities
will endorse these instruments. |
|
3. Substance Abuse Efforts
|
An integrated approach to the prevention of youth alcohol and
substance abuse that involves individuals, families, schools and
community organizations becomes a funding and implementation priority
for the San Diego County Board of Supervisors, local municipalities
and youth servicing agencies.
|
|
4. Community Norms
|
A community norms campaign is designed
and implemented in partnership with police departments, probation
departments, youth serving agencies, community members and youth
that communicates positively-focused community laws and norms that
address substance abuse, weapons possession and crime (including
delinquency behaviors such as truancy). |
|
5. Risk and Treatment Needs Instruments
|
The San Diego County Board of Supervisors
and other local municipalities adopt strength-based, family-focused
risk and resiliency assessment instruments for assessing at-risk
youth and their families. Implementation is by public and private
agencies and the community. |
|
6. Systemwide, Balanced Approach To Funding
|
A systemwide, balanced approach
to funding prevention, early intervention and graduated sanctions
programs that considers both safety needs of the community and treatment
needs of at-risk youth and families is utilized by the San Diego
County Board of Supervisors, local municipalities, government agencies
and youth serving agencies. |
|
7. Public Outreach Strategy
|
A comprehensive, regional public outreach
strategy that engages the public and policy makers in the promotion
of healthy and crime-free lifestyles, and focuses on prevention
and reduction of juvenile crime, is operational in all areas of
San Diego County. |
|
8. Cross-Systems Training
|
Design, develop and implement ongoing cross-systems
training programs between public and private agency providers to
acquire common language and methodologies and promote regional collaboration. |
|
9. Interagency Agreements
|
Formal interagency agreements (such as
Memorandums of Understanding or Agreement) are written and adopted
that explicitly state the relationships, roles, responsibilities
and expected outcomes between agencies working with children, youth
and families. |
- Case Management and Process Control
|
Institutionalize a case management system
that follows each youth and family throughout the various stages
of the continuum. The Chief Probation Officer is designated with
the responsibility and provided with the required resources to coordinate
an interagency, centralized intake process, case management and
program control (including assessment, monitoring and feedback)
for identified at-risk and juvenile offenders. |
|
Management Information System
|
MIS efforts are enhanced, available, and
capable of facilitating relevant information and data sharing by
all criminal justice agencies and collaborating entities (public
and private), consistent with appropriate protection of privacy
rights. |
|
12. Evaluation
|
Locally relevant, ongoing evaluation of
programs, strategies, and systemwide responses are conducted on
all programs in order to allocate resources by the San Diego County
Board of Supervisors, local municipalities and youth serving agencies
based upon need and documented effectiveness. |
IMPLEMENTING THE COMPREHENSIVE
STRATEGY_________
Keeping with the theme of ending duplication and redundancy, the Juvenile
Justice Coordinating Council from SB 1760 was asked to oversee the implementation
of the Comprehensive Strategy Plan. This protected San Diego from forming
yet another governing body and creating a larger bureaucracy. As the
Comprehensive Strategy Team was moving forward in its planning, it became
evident that a full-time coordinator was needed. San Diego learned that
coordinating the efforts of public, private, youth and family serving
entities throughout the region under the umbrella of the Comprehensive
Strategy is a monumental task. Therefore, a full-time Coordinator position
was established in April 1998. One of the many duties of the Comprehensive
Strategy Coordinator is to facilitate and staff the six work groups,
which deal specifically with issues revealed during planning and implementation
phases. Representatives from the work groups are the conduits for information
sharing between the Juvenile Justice Coordinating Council and the work
group members. (Please see Attachment 6 for a brief description of
the work groups, their missions and strategies.)
Throughout the planning process "Comprehensive Strategy Themes" clearly
emerged. The Comprehensive Strategy Team concluded that these themes
must be the foundation upon which services and programs are designed
and delivered. The successful implementation of the Comprehensive Strategy
must ensure that the spirit of these themes is incorporated not just
in services and programs, but also in agencies, organizations and institutions
that work with youth and their families.
COMPREHENSIVE STRATEGY
THEMES_____________________
- Provide a full continuum of care:
- Include youth family members, and other significant community
members in program design, development and implementation.
- Be family-focused, strengthen families and provide intergenerational
family support services, resources and parenting skills.
- Promote a community delinquency prevention model as the
most cost-effective and humane approach, assuring access to community-based
resources; and
- Provide graduated sanctions with early identification,
diversion, intervention and ongoing support as follows:
- Immediate intervention for first-time, nonviolent offenders;
- Intermediate sanctions for more serious offenders;
- Secure care programs for most violent offenders; and
- Aftercare programs involving family and community to assist
youth with reintegrating into the community following out-of-home
placement.
- Be holistic (comprehensive or multi-systemic) and multidisciplinary,
dealing simultaneously with many aspects of the youth's life. Address
the youth's family and relationships dealing with intimacy, community,
peers, school and work.
- Utilize a case manager and case management approach that
begins at intake and follows the youth through various program phases
until successful completion. This involves the development of individual
service plans that are updated on a consistent and goal-driven basis.
- Build upon youth and family strengths rather than focusing
on their weaknesses. We need to shift the primary emphasis from
risks to resiliency.
- Hold families accountable for their children and systems
accountable to families.
- Be gender-specific and culturally and linguistically appropriate.
Programs must reach and be accepted by diverse racial, cultural
and socioeconomic groups in the community.
- Be intensive, have multiple contacts with at-risk youth
by staff who have manageable caseloads that allow for individualized
attention and follow through.
- Offer comprehensive alcohol and other drug treatment, recovery
and aftercare services in all phases of the continuum, including
prevention.
- Have a solid focus on education, job readiness, skills training
and employment through combined intensive support services.
- Utilize comprehensive community risk and resource models
that prioritize target areas.
- Adopt common definitions, referral and response protocols,
and instruments for assessing risks to the community and treatment
needs of individual juvenile offenders that may be used by all agencies
that participate in the juvenile justice system (including law enforcement,
education and community-based organizations).
- Develop information systems that enable data sharing for
client case management, tracking, budgeting, monitoring and evaluation,
and that are accessible by criminal justice agencies and collaborating
entities (while maintaining legally mandated confidentiality).
- Provide ongoing evaluation based upon agreed assessment
and response mechanisms to all system participants for informed
decision making.
- Adopt a systemwide resource allocation strategy, rather
than funding on a program-by-program basis. Implement service consolidation
and redesign where appropriate.
PROMISING APPROACHES__________________________________
Using the twelve recommendations and the Comprehensive Strategy Themes
the Comprehensive Strategy Team, through work facilitated by NCCD and
DRP, designed six "Promising Approaches". These Approaches are the first
step in beginning to fill identified needs and gaps in the continuum.
The Approaches include desired outcomes, indicators, participant results,
program results and an implementation plan. Each Approach gives specific
measurable results for all focus areas. The six Approaches are: Vocational
Training/School to Career, Taking It to the Local Level, Parent Training
and In Home Support, Afterschool Programs, Substance Abuse and Girls
Programs.
PROMISING APPROACH #1:
VOCATIONAL TRAINING-SCHOOL TO CAREER
| Desired Outcomes |
- Youth choose to be self-sufficient (financially,
emotionally and socially);
- Youth know their strengths and utilize them
to be productive citizens of the community;
- Youth enter adulthood with basic life skills,
as well as vocational and academic competency; and
- Education will promote and develop vocational
training programs for those who are not college bound.
|
| Indicators |
1. Education V
Decrease dropout and truancy rate. Increase graduations and certifications.
2. Employment V
Youth not in school receive vocational training or employment.
Increase number employed or in school.
3. Vocational Assessment/Personal Interest Inventory
V All students receive one by
grade 10; 50% by grade 7; and 25% by grade 4.
4. Competency (individual & systemic) V
Commitment to change focus from pass/fail to competency.
5. Vocational Training V
Increase options and capacity to provide opportunities for youth.
6. Apprenticeships V
Increase options and capacity to provide opportunities for youth.
|
| Promising Approaches |
- Build the framework that will inventory and
coordinate existing vocational skills, school to career, employment
preparation and apprenticeship
programs for the region; and
- Vocational Aptitude/Personal Interest Inventory
provided by education in grades 4, 7 and 10. Purpose is to identify
and build upon strengths for
future educational/career track. |
| Participant Results |
- Lower dropout rate;
- Increased rate of certifications and graduations;
- Increased competency in life skills; and
- Increased rate of youth engaged in full-time
education, training, employment or combination thereof.
|
| Program Results |
- Vocational training services are coordinated
and linked throughout the region;
- Education partners with the private sector
to increase youth's vocational skills and opportunities for
employment; and
- Career/vocational opportunities are increased.
|
| Implementation Plan |
- Identify the lead;
- Identify the key players;
- Determine common vision;
- Inventory existing services, capacities, gaps
and resources;
- Develop a partnership between business, education
and the community;
- Cultivate relationships with community collaboratives;
- Develop subcommittees: What Works? Evaluation
and Mentoring;
- Career days; and
- Implement Vocational Assessment/Personal Interest
Inventory Project.
|
PROMISING APPROACH #2:
TAKING IT TO THE LOCAL LEVEL
| Desired Outcomes |
- Obtain local key leader commitment to a regional
Comprehensive Strategy;
- Establish neighborhood Comprehensive Strategy
community planning teams; and
3. Institutionalize collaborative decision-making
regionwide. |
| Indicators |
1a. Formal community resolutions
are in place;
b. Memorandums of Agreement are in place;
c. Programs are funded based upon assessment;
d. Programs are funded based upon outcomes; and
e. Community planning team infrastructure is in
place.
2a. Number of communities assessed for readiness
to convene a planning team;
b. Number of communities with planning teams established;
and
c. Number of communities with a local Comprehensive
Strategy Plan.
3a. Allocation of resources is reflective of a
local community Comprehensive Strategy Plan;
b. A regional linkage exists for consistent governance
of community planning teams;
c. Community governance exists over discretionary
resource allocation;
d. Community planning teams obtain 5% private funding
and resources; and
e. Regional collaborative training is available.
|
| Promising Approaches |
- Information Dissemination on Community Health
- San Diego County Report Card; and
- Regional Data Sharing Forum.
- Community Engagement
- Children's Initiative;
- 1741's, Title V's, Community Collaboratives,
Heartbeat, Healthy Starts, New Beginnings, Partners for Success;
and
- Public Relations Campaign on community norm
changing.
|
| Participant Results |
Increased positive outcomes
for children and families as indicated by key community health indicators |
| Program Results |
1a. A shared, structured
decision-making process is in place;
b. There is a shared MIS system in place (with
unique ID algorithm);
2a. Number of Comprehensive Strategy community
planning teams in place; and
b. Number of Comprehensive Strategy community plans
in place.
|
| Implementation Plan |
- San Diego County Report Card is currently operational.
The Report Card will provide regional and local data on key
health and safety indicators by zip code, census tract and city
and county jurisdictions within two years. The first year of
data collection will establish the baseline data;
- Regional Data Sharing Forum meets monthly;
and
- Community Assessment Teams are using the same
intake/screening assessment and data collection procedures.
|
PROMISING APPROACH #3:
PARENT TRAINING/IN HOME SUPPORT
| Desired
Outcome
|
- Promote individual, family and community well-being;
- Individuals, families and communities are safe;
- All services are family driven;
- Families are self-sufficient;
- Families are involved and informed participants
in decision making and planning; and
- Families are connected to each other and their
communities.
|
| Indicators |
1a. Increases
in women seeking prenatal care and increases in immunization rates;
and
b. Decreases in positive toxic births and decreases
in substance abuse.
2a. Decreases in child abuse and family violence
incidents;
b. Decreases in arrest rates; and
c. Decreases in school suspensions and expulsions.
3. Mutually agreed upon service plan and client
satisfaction survey.
4a. Increase employment rate and number of adults
moving from welfare to work;
b. Improve access to health care; and
c. Improve access to housing and knowledge of community
resources.
5a. Improve involvement in schools and participation
in community events; and
b. Increase in voter registration and voting.
6a. Increase number of families utilizing Community
Centers and Family Resource Centers;
b. Increase number of community members participating
in local/regional planning; and
c. Increase number of community volunteers.
|
| Promising
Approaches
|
- Provide in-home visiting support that is culturally,
developmentally appropriate and specifically tailored to meet
individual and family needs.
- Increase citizen- and community- driven involvement
through partnerships in community collaborations.
|
| Participant
Results
|
- Increase number of families meeting basic needs
and moving toward self-sufficiency as measured by improvements
in employment, health care
access and school performance, as well as decrease
incidents of family violence and substance abuse.
2a. Increase attendance at community events and responsibility
for neighborhood; and
b. Increase voting and personal accountability.
|
| Program Results |
1a. Parent-defined,
in-home services are accessible through neighborhood centers in
all local communities throughout San Diego County; and
b. All services are provided in an individualized,
culturally linguistically appropriate and sensitive manner.
2. Collaboratives exist that include a broad range
of empowered people and organizations that are responsible for
their communities.
|
| Implementation
Plan
|
- Identify key community stakeholders; public
and private service providers;
- Involve local neighborhood centers and utilize
existing community assessments and input to identify family
needs in communities;
- Identify needed resources and secure funding;
- Create multidisciplinary service teams to provide
in-home services built upon the concepts of empowering families;
- Cross train staff and families; and
- Ten Service and Resource Centers exist in each
county supervisorial district (GOAL).
|
PROMISING APPROACH #4
AFTERSCHOOL PROGRAMS
| Desired
Outcomes
|
1. Increase quantity and quality of positive
active alternatives for youth;
2. Increase quantity and quality of supervision
of youth;
3. Increase bonding between youth, their communities
and programs for youth;
4. Increase family support and active involvement
of family in afterschool environments;
5. Increase safety for youth; and
6. Increase quality of interactions between
peers.
|
| Indicators |
1a. Number of youth unsupervised
afterschool; and
b. Youths' perceptions and evaluation of the
quality of the afterschool programming.
2a. Youth and family member participation rates
in afterschool programs; and
b. Parents' perception and evaluations of the
quality of the afterschool programming.
3. Number of community members, youth and parents
volunteering to work in the afterschool programs.
4a. Number of parents who volunteer in the
afterschool program; and
b. Number of parents and siblings who participate
in program celebrations, potlucks, community service activities,
support groups, etc.
5a. Number of youth who are victims or perpetrators
of crimes afterschool; and
b. Number of youth exhibiting youth risk behaviors.
|
| Promising
Approaches |
- Establishment of on or near school site
afterschool programming that offers short-term activity choices,
encourages peer and adult interactions and creates a community
environment around the school.
- Youth form a Youth Planning Council where concerned
parents, community members and youth join together to discuss
program planning and development, meet community leaders and
share issues and concerns relevant to the youth and community.
- Develop working groups that target select populations
of youth, such as those referred by the juvenile justice system
or those at risk of early
pregnancy or drug use.
|
| Participant
Results
|
1a. Increased
competency in specific, youth-identified interest areas;
b. Reduction in risk behaviors;
c. Increased levels of involvement in structured,
supervised afterschool activities; and
d. Increased social skills.
2a. Positive completion of justice system case
plan;
b. Integration of at-risk youth into mainstream;
and
c. Reduction in identified risk behavior.
|
| Program
Results
|
1a. Increased
community attachment;
b. High levels of satisfaction with program;
c. Early identification resources;
d. Decrease in juvenile crimes during afterschool
program hours;
e. Increase in number of institutions and organizations
actively involved in the afterschool program; and
f. Improved ability to identify at-risk youth.
2a. Juvenile Justice System satisfaction with
the afterschool program; and
b. Reduction in youth recidivism rates.
|
Implementation
Plan
|
1. Involve the community in community planning
efforts;
2. Select target communities and target population
in community;
3. Identify needs such as funding, space and
resources and develop a plan to meet these needs;
4. Recruit, hire, orient and train staff and
volunteers;
5. Develop accountability fiscal and paperwork
systems and program forms;
6. Establish procedures for publicizing program
and fostering community awareness and involvement;
7. Conduct enrollment process; and
8. Establish Youth Planning Council and regular meetings
schedule. |
PROMISING APPROACH #5:
SUBSTANCE ABUSE
| Desired Outcomes |
- Increase number of healthy families;
- Increase attachment/bonding/modeling to adults
and peers;
- Increase positive interactions to institutions;
- Clear and consistent messages regarding values;
- Reduction of crime and violence; and
Increase access to culturally and linguistically appropriate
health, education, social, psychological, support and treatment
services. |
Indicators
|
1a. Reduction
of positive toxicology births;
b. Reported age of first use increases;
c. Reduction in reported use of Alcohol, Tobacco
and Other Drugs (ATOD); and
d. Reduction of ATOD on board at Juvenile Hall
admission.
2a. Increase in number of mentoring relationships
between youth and adults; and
b. Increase in Beacon schools in County.
3a. Increase in number of culturally appropriate,
accessible activities during afterschool hours; and
b. Increase composition of planning/policy groups
that reflect community composition.
4a. Increase in number of cities that require conditional
use permits for alcohol outlets and advertising.
b. Reduction in number of decoy citations; and
c. Reduction of ATOD use.
5a. Reduction of youth DUI arrests; and
b. Reduction of juvenile ATOD-related crimes (perpetrators
and victims).
6. Increase in number of neighborhood centers.
|
| Promising
Approaches |
- Neighborhood-based problem solving and governance:
Beacon schools, neighborhood centers, neighborhood councils,
etc.; and
- Youth involvement in the coordination of resources,
blended funds and the standardization of assessment and evaluation.
|
| Participant
Results |
1a. Increased
engagement of community in problem-solving; and
b. Increased youth participation.
|
| Program Results |
- Increase in bed availability and numbers; and
- Community-based, family-focused and youth-oriented
services with organizational development and training.
|
| Implementation
Plan |
- Community awareness meeting;
- Community organizational development and training;
- Systemwide coordination council/board;
- Institutionalization of neighborhood councils;
- Legislation change for information exchange;
- Technology for information exchange;
- Information repository established;
- Standard evaluation system; and
- Ongoing funding commitments.
|
PROMISING APPROACH #6:
GIRLS PROGRAMS
| Desired Outcomes |
- A resource product based upon compilation and
analysis of research-based data that identifies the unique biological
and psychosocial needs and problems of girls; and
- A countywide educational, health and justice
model that implements strategies and programs that promote health,
well being and safety of girls.
|
| Indicators |
- Decrease in victimization (child abuse, rape
and dating violence);
- Decrease in teenage pregnancy;
- Decrease in self-abuse behavior (suicide, eating
disorders, MH referrals);
- Decrease in substance abuse;
- Decrease in truancy/school dropout; and
- Decrease in violent behavior.
|
| Promising
Approaches |
1. A countywide
task force comprised of community leaders to provide guidance and
oversight for community education that promotes attitudes in
agencies and systems that encourage girls to reach
their full potential; and
2. Model local and national programs that have
successfully implemented effective programs and services which
respond to the needs of girls.
|
| Participant
Results |
- Improved health, education and safety;
- Improved self sufficiency; and
- Reduced teen pregnancy and substance abuse.
|
| Program Results |
- Reduced victimization;
- Reduced teen pregnancy;
- Reduced criminal justice referral;
- Reduced substance abuse; and
- Increased resources for job training/employment.
|
| Implementation
Plan |
- Identify key leaders and establish countywide
task force;
- Inventory existing services unique to girls;
- Develop source documents to educate the public
to the unique needs of girls; and
- Provide a framework for development of short-
and long-term strategies to address girls' issues.
|
(See Attachment 3 for a Description of Gender-Specific Programs)
ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND BRANCHING
IMPACTS:___________
Agencies, organizations and individuals have not waited for the completion
of the Comprehensive Strategy planning process to begin to fill needs
and gaps. Specific programs and strategies have been developed, funded
and implemented as our work identifying needs continues. These programs
and strategies are consistent with the afore mentioned recommendations,
Comprehensive Strategy Themes and Promising Approaches. The programs
and strategies include:
- CRITICAL HOURS PROGRAM: The County Board of Supervisors,
through the Children's Investment Trust Fund, awarded $1.2 million
in FY '97-98 and $1.5 million in FY '98-99 for afterschool programs
for middle school age youth in San Diego County. The San Diego County
Critical Hours Program seeks to foster collaborative efforts among
public, private and nonprofit organizations that have in the past
been fragmented and isolated in their efforts to serve children, youth
and families. Critical Hours seeks to address youth violence, health
and social issues that affect youth (e.g. crime, gang involvement,
teen pregnancy, substance abuse and peer group pressure) and offer
an alternative support system. With required program components, including
health, education, recreation and interpersonal skills/self-esteem
development, Critical Hours programs encourage a partnering of community
organizations (i.e. education + recreation + social services + art
organizations) to provide high quality programming at each site. Twenty-seven
programs were started in September 1997, and have served more than
12,000 middle school age youth. The County will expand to 38 sites
in 1998-99. There are currently 18 lead agencies with 150 collaborative
partners.
- COMMUNITY CHALLENGE GRANTS: The California Office of Community
Challenge Grants and the San Diego County Health and Human Services
Agency, awarded eight $500,000 Teen Pregnancy Prevention grants. The
grants were awarded to San Diego Youth and Community Services, Escondido
Youth Encounter, University of California, San Diego, Neighborhood
House, YMCA-Youth and Family Services, North Park Family Health Clinic,
Vista Community Clinic and San Dieguito Union School District. These
grants are intended to prevent teenage pregnancy and to reduce the
number of absent fathers. Emphasis is placed on communities with greatest
need. Programs include mentoring for male youth, male involvement
in family programs, youth talk line, human sexuality for males/females,
reproductive health education for males/females, development of healthy
relationship skills, improving communication skills and the development
of goals for a more enriched life.
- BREAKING CYCLES: Breaking Cycles is a $6.9 million SB 1760
State grant awarded to the San Diego County Probation Department.
This three-year program (beginning July 1997) funds delinquency prevention
through a range of graduated sanctions to prevent initiation into
a lifestyle of gangs, drugs, violence and crime. The graduated sanctions
component provides for multidisciplinary assessment of all adjudicated
youth removed from, or at risk of removal from, the home; expands
day treatment to North County region; and provides substance abuse
treatment for all families based upon assessed need. The prevention
component establishes strength-based family assessment at Community
Assessment Teams to reduce the number of youth entering the justice
system by referring the youth and their families to the appropriate
services.
- AT-RISK YOUTH EARLY INTERVENTION PROGRAM: Senator Alpert's
SB 1050 secured a $2 million, one-year grant (in addition to SB 1760)
that builds upon the community assessment center framework that was
defined in the Breaking Cycles grant. SB 1050 provides funding for
direct wraparound services and linkages with community resources through
family-focused, neighborhood based community assessment teams and
centers. SB 1050 was awarded to the San Diego County Probation Department,
which subcontracted with local community based agencies to provide
direct prevention and intervention services to youth and their families.
- JUVENILE REPEAT OFFENDER PREVENTION PROGRAM (Project 8%):
California State funding of $400,000 per year to Project 8% in San
Diego County provides wraparound services to youth at risk of being
chronic, serious violent offenders; subsequent legislation doubled
the funding and extended the program for another two years (until
June 2000). This funding was awarded to the San Diego County Probation
Department and is a collaborative program between the Departments
of Probation and the Health and Human Services Agency. This program
has a multidisciplinary team with a Probation Officer, Social Worker,
Psychologist and Substance Abuse Counselor. It is designed to provide
integrated services to families of atrisk youth to minimize delinquency
and costs of processing youth through the juvenile justice system.
It also provides prevention services to siblings at risk of entering
the delinquency system and preservation services to their families.
- ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, and OTHER DRUGS (ATOD) PREVENTION FRAMEWORK:
This framework re-engineers the San Diego County Health and Human
Services Agency ATOD prevention services to regional based, youth-
focused and collaboration-driven programs. This reengineering is funded
by the $22 million General Fund, which includes Federal Substance
Abuse Prevention Treatment Block Grant, State General Funds, and approximately
eighteen other funding sources for 180 program components.
- SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT: The San Diego County Board of
Supervisors has taken actions over the past 18 months to increase
adolescent alcohol and drug treatment and intervention funding by
nearly $2.8 million. This increases the number of youth served from
600 to 3,000 on an annual basis and has reduced wait time for services
from 12 weeks to 2 weeks or less. It has also increased residential
treatment beds to 750, and increased the number of treatment service
providers. Funding is from the San Diego County Health and Human Services
Agency General Fund, which includes Federal Substance Abuse Prevention
Treatment Block Grant and State General Funds.
- SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT on DEMAND, for YOUTH: Twenty-two
million dollars from the San Diego County Health and Human Services
Agency General Fund was utilized to establish five additional regional
Teen Recovery Centers in South Bay, San Marcos, Encinitas, Lakeside
and Mid-City. Mental Health Systems, Phoenix House and San Diego Youth
and Community Services are the agencies funded. These programs also
expanded residential capacity for adolescents, including seventeen
new detoxification beds. Services include one-to-one counseling, group
counseling, family counseling, social recreation activities, NA/AA
programs, and offer coping/life skills for success on the outside
world.
- JUVENILE DEPENDENCY COURT RECOVERY PROJECT: The partnership
between the San Diego County Chief Administrator's Office Dependency
Court Tiger Team and the Superior Court introduced a new intervention
for the Dependency Court process in mid-April 1998. Targeted toward
parents whose neglect or abuse cases involve an alcohol and/or drug
problem, a new substance abuse case management function has been implemented.
This new process will provide assessment of substance abuse problems,
prompt referral and assistance in entering alcohol and drug treatment
programs, alcohol and drug testing and a comprehensive reporting system.
This reporting system will report to the Dependency Court and the
Children's Services Bureau the progress of parents in the program
and their compliance to the Court order of participation.
- GENDER-SPECIFIC SERVICES for GIRLS: The San Diego
YMCA, Youth and Family Services was recently awarded a $100,000 one-year
grant from the Office of Criminal Justice Planning to provide gender-specific
services for San Diego girls, with highest priority given to girls
on probation. These services include but are not limited to addressing
physical and emotional abuse, relationship issues, sexuality and reproductive
issues, individual and family counseling, independent living skills,
vocational training and parenting skills. Additionally, the National
Council on Crime & Delinquency was awarded a California Wellness
Foundation Grant to study gender-specific programs for girls in San
Diego County.
- SAN DIEGO COUNTY HEALTH and HUMAN SERVICES HOME VISITING: The
San Diego County Health and Human Services Agency, Family Support
Home Visiting Partnership (FSHVP) works to ensure that all children
in San Diego County are: born healthy; begin school eager and ready
to learn; and remain healthy, safe and secure. The FSHVP mission is
to ensure all San Diego families have access to confidential and voluntary
home visitation and family support services that are individualized,
culturally and linguistically appropriate, cost-effective and of the
highest quality. In March 1998, the San Diego County Health and Human
Services Agency implemented the Cal-SAHF "best practices" home-visiting
program, which is funded by a $954,000 three-year grant from the Office
of Child Abuse Prevention. It was awarded to the San Diego County
Health and Human Services Agency and contracted to the Escondido Youth
Encounter (EYE) Counseling and Crisis Services. The EYE is delivering
home visiting services to 125 families in the North Coastal region
of the County. The target population is families with drug-exposed
infants, age birth to three months, who are at-risk for child abuse
and neglect.
- JOB TRAINING for FOSTER, GANG and HIGH RISK YOUTH: The San
Diego Work Force Partnership has allotted more than $1 million in
funding to assist high-risk youth with job training skills and job
placement.
- SCHOOL-TO-CAREER: The majority of youth on probation are
in need of services to enable them to transition to independent living
and adulthood. Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (TANF) funding
has been earmarked for a School-to-Career Program to address this
critical service gap identified by the Juvenile Justice Coordinating
Council. Between 800 to 1000 wards of the Court annually are projected
to receive services at an estimated cost of $600 to $750 per program
participant. The Probation Department will provide program coordination
and contract monitoring services for twenty Vocational Counselors
and Job Placement Counselors providing the vocational assessment and
employment placement services.
- SCHOOL, PROBATION and JUVENILE COURT COOPERATION: In San
Diego County, schools and probation officers have worked hard to keep
children in school. In July 1997, the District Attorney's Office increased
its efforts to help combat truancy, a leading indicator of juvenile
delinquency. A truancy database and the addition of a part-time assistant
dedicated solely to School Attendance Review Board (SARB) cases have
facilitated the effectiveness of the teamwork between SARB members,
prosecutors and court staff. The Juvenile Court also has contributed
to the efforts, by assigning one judge to hear truancy matters on
a weekly basis.
- SAN DIEGO COUNTY REPORT CARD: The San Diego County Health
and Human Services Agency and San Diego Children's Hospital Center
for Child Health Outcomes have jointly created the components of a
child/family health and well-being report card. The Report Card is
comprised of scientifically based and/or consensus-derived measures
that together form a population-based, data-driven monitoring system.
The primary goal of this system is to track and trend identified child
and family health and well-being indicators during a time of sweeping
changes in both public policies and the systems servicing this population.
A one-time grant of $88,000 was awarded to Children's Hospital from
the Alliance Health Care Foundation. (Please see Attachment 4 for
a list of Indicators used in the Report Card).
- A SHARED, STRUCTURED DECISION-MAKING PROCESS: San Diego's Regional
Risk & Resiliency 4 Checkup:
The Checkup is a research-based classification device for engaging
the community in neighborhood-based services to strengthen families.
It is representative of the cutting-edge efforts in prevention and
early intervention being field tested in San Diego. The Checkup uses
the concept of a blood pressure check. A reading outside the normal
range alerts a person to possible health problems and allows families
to take steps to avoid harm. In many instances, that information is
enough to motivate change. The Checkup provides a portrait of a family's
risk and resiliency compared to what is typical for San Diego families.
It will also provide information and access to community resources
for at-risk families. A $15,000 award was granted to the Justice System's
Assessment and Training (Brian Mattson and Brad Bogue) from the National
Institute of Corrections and the County of San Diego Probation Department.
(Please see Attachment 5 for the tool.)
SUMMARY__________________________________________________
As we move into the 21st century, San Diego County is dramatically
reengineering local government. The public sector is being expected
to compete with the private sector and produce a quality, cost effective
product. Under the direction of the San Diego County Board of Supervisors,
business and strategic plans are being developed for each county department,
functions and tasks are being merged, and outstanding risk management
and customer service is being rewarded. As part of this process, local
government agencies serving youth are being redesigned for maximum efficiency
and improved effectiveness.
The bottom line is that approaches to serving the needs of youth and
families in our region are rapidly evolving. Many changes are occurring
- both in the way we think about programs and services and the methods
used to deliver them. However, certain realities and priorities are
clear and command consensus. Policy makers, legislators and the community
support strengthening the prevention network and intervening effectively
at the first "red flag" or "trigger" event that puts a child at risk
of entering the juvenile justice system.
While San Diego County citizens support the incarceration of juveniles
committing violent, serious crimes, they overwhelmingly favor providing
prevention services to at-risk children and swift intervention for youth
experiencing problems. San Diego County citizens expect the juvenile
justice system to provide juvenile accountability, as well as victim
and community restoration. Community solutions to community problems
are preferred.
Some studies have shown that 90 percent of youth that have been exposed
to prevention programs believe they made a positive difference in their
lives. Californians and San Diegans have demonstrated that prevention
programs are a good investment of their tax dollars.
This favorable attitude toward aggressive prevention and intervention
strategies is particularly evident in the area of substance abuse treatment.
San Diego County views substance abuse treatment as an investment that
will reduce crime and save tax dollars that would otherwise be spent
on prisons.
As San Diego County celebrates our accomplishments thus far, we also
recognize the ongoing effort required to reach full implementation of
the Comprehensive Strategy Plan. From policy makers to Neighborhood
Watch groups, from agency diversion counselors to youth in leadership
development programs, everyone must collaboratively engage in a sustained,
regionwide commitment to actualize the CLEAR vision. In order to maintain
the direction over the long term, we must continue our fiscal and philosophical
commitment to supporting the Comprehensive Strategy Plan. As we build
upon existing resources, address needs and gaps, strengthen youth and
families, and integrate a full continuum of care, we are enhancing the
quality of life for all San Diegans. The Comprehensive Strategy Plan
serves as a blueprint and foundation for San Diego County as we strengthen
and expand services and programs for youth and their families.
|